Tuesday, May 27, 2014

We'll Find Alien Life in This Lifetime, Scientists Tell Congress

Humans have long wondered whether we are alone in the universe. According to scientists working with the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) Institute, the question may be answered in the near future.

"It's unproven whether there is any life beyond Earth," Seth Shostak, senior astronomer at the SETI Institute, said at a House Committee on Science, Space and Technology hearing Wednesday (May 21). "I think that situation is going to change within everyone's lifetime in this room."

Scientists search for life beyond Earth using three different methods, Shostak said. [13 Ways to Find E.T.]

The first method involves the search for microbial extraterrestrials or their remains. Investigations include robotic missions to Mars, such as Curiosity and Opportunity, which are currently searching for signs that the Red Planet could once have hosted potentially habitable environments.

Local habitable worlds?

But Mars isn't the only target in the solar system. In fact, Shostak said there are "at least half a dozen other worlds" in Earth's neighborhood that have the potential to be habitable. Icy moons such as Jupiter's Europa and Ganymede hide subsurface oceans, while Saturn's largest moon, Titan, contains lakes of liquid methane, all of which could make the moons appealing homes for life.

A second technique involves examining the atmospheres of planets in orbit around other stars for traces of oxygen or methane or other gases that could be produced by biological processes. As an observed planet passes between Earth and its sun, a thick enough atmosphere has the potential to be detected. [10 Exoplanets That Could Host Life]

Shostak said both of these methods could yield results in the next two decades.

The third plan involves searching not just for life, but also for intelligent life — a project that SETI pioneers. By scouring the universe for signals in a variety of spectrums, SETI hopes to find intentional or accidental broadcasts from extraterrestrial civilizations.

Determining the success rate of such a program is difficult, but Shostak said that the best estimates suggest that a reasonable chance of success would come after examining a few million star systems. So far, SETI has examined less than 1 percent of those star systems. However, Shostak expects that number to increase as technology advances.

"Given predicted advances in technology, looking at a few million star systems can be done in the next 20 years," he said.

"Teeming with … life"

NASA's Kepler telescope has revealed that planets are abundant in the galaxy. Each of the 4 billion stars in our galaxy has an average of 1.6 planets in orbit around it, with one out of five of those planets are likely to be "Earth cousins." That means there are tens of billions of potentially habitable planets in the Milky Way alone.

"If this is the only planet on which not only life, but intelligent life, has arisen, that would be very unusual," Shostak said. [Poll: Do You Believe Alien Life Exists?]

On Earth, life arose in the first billion years of the planet's 4.5-billion-year history. Its rapid origination suggests that it could arise quickly elsewhere as well, which could result in a profusion of life on planets across the galaxy.

"I suspect that the universe is teeming with microbial life," Dan Werthimer, director of the SETI Research Center at the University of California, Berkeley, told the committee.

How much of that life might be intelligent is another question altogether.

On one hand, although life arose early in Earth's existence, complex — and then intelligent — life took much longer to develop.

"This place has been carpeted with life, and almost all that time, it required a microscope to see it," Shostak said.

However, Werthimer noted that intelligent life evolved in several species on Earth. He suggested that some planets evolve selective pressures that guide evolution toward different characteristics. On one planet, it may be most beneficial for life to be fast, while on others, it might need to be strong to survive.

"I think there are going to be some planets in the universe where it's advantageous to be smart," Werthimer said.

Hunting for intelligence

Werthimer outlined several of the programs SETI utilizes in its search for intelligent life. The most well known of these is its use of the largest telescope in the world, the 1,000-foot (305 meters) Arecibo Observatory in Puerto Rico. 

Although most astronomers would feel lucky to obtain a day of observations with the instrument, scientists at SETI have figured out how to "piggyback" their research onto other observations, allowing for virtually continuous observation of the universe.

It requires a significant amount of computing power to churn through the resulting data in search of signals. In 1999, SETI@home was released to allow members of the public to put their computer to work when it might otherwise be idle. Today, 8.4 million users in 226 countries have the program running as a screensaver.

"Together, the volunteers have created the most powerful supercomputer on the planet," Werthimer said.

When asked about potential safety issues with downloading the program, Werthimer said, "In my opinion, SETI@home is one of the safest things you can install on the computer." He pointed to the millions of users who have put it through its paces over the last 15 years. On top of that, the program is open source, which means that anyone can examine it for viruses or potential problems in the code.

In the next few months, SETI will launch its Panchromatic SETI program, using six telescopes to scour the skies for signals in a variety of wavelengths, including radio, optical and infrared.

"This will be an extremely comprehensive search," Werthimer said.

Another program seeks to eavesdrop on potential communications between two bodies in an alien solar system. Just as NASA sends signals to the Curiosity rover on Mars, or would need to communicate with a future outpost on another body in the solar system, alien civilizations may be in the process of exploring or colonizing their own neighborhood. By using information from Kepler, SETI scientists can observe when two planets line up in another system and attempt to eavesdrop on potential signals.

By relying on a multitude of technologies in the search for advanced alien civilizations, SETI hopes to increase its odds of finding intelligent life beyond the solar system. Programs continue to evolve alongside technology, as SETI attempts to put a new one in play each year.

"I think the best strategy is a multiple-[pronged] strategy," Werthimer said. "We should be looking for all kinds of different signals and not put all of our eggs in one basket."

Shostak agreed, and noted that dated technology, such as radio signals, may not necessarily be obsolete.

"One shouldn't discount a technology just because it's been around awhile," he said. "We use the wheel every day."

If scientists were to discover a signal that might potentially stem from an alien civilization, the news would spread fairly rapidly. SETI might ask observers at another observatory to verify the data before officially announcing it, but such news would never stay under wraps for long.

"The public has the idea that the government has a secret plan for what we would do if we picked up a signal," Shostak said.
But he said he's received no calls or clandestine visits for the false alarms SETI has already observed.
In fact, Shostak said the news will spread before it can be fully verified.

"There will be false alarms," he said.

Funding the search

For all their optimism about the potential to find new life, both Shostak and Werthimer were realistic about the limits of their research. Currently, SETI houses only 24 full-time scientists. Of those, two-thirds are from the United States.

The Berkeley program exists primarily on a budget of roughly $1 million a year, made up of research grants from NASA, the National Science Foundation (NSF) and private donors.

The two primary telescopes utilized by SETI are also in jeopardy. Budget cuts have been made to the Arecibo telescope, while the NSF plans to discontinue funding for the Green Bank telescope in West Virginia.

At the same time, China is building a radio telescope nearly twice as large as Arecibo, while the Square Kilometer Array Telescope project is in progress in South Africa. Both telescopes stand to become significant SETI observatories, and the United States isn't involved.

"The U.S. may not continue to lead this work," Werthimer said.

"I would find that disappointing," Rep. Suzanne Bonamici, D-Ore., responded.

Both Shostak and Werthimer expressed their optimism that intelligent life exists somewhere in the galaxy, and that it should be detectable in the near future, as long as SETI continues to receive the support it needs. Between the knowledge that might be obtained from an advanced civilization and the idea of mankind's biological intellectual place in the universe, humans stand to gain a great deal from learning that we are not alone.
"Finding other sentient life in the universe would be the most significant discovery in human history," said Committee Chairman Lamar Smith, R-Texas.

Put your computer to work by installing SETI@home.

Follow us @Spacedotcom, Facebook and Google+. Original article on Space.com.
Copyright 2014 SPACE.com, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


By  Nola Taylor Redd

We'll Find Alien Life in This Lifetime, Scientists Tell Congress

Sunday, May 25, 2014

Understanding Alien Messages May Be No Different Than Decoding theRosetta Stone

The world's largest radio telescope in Arecibo, Puerto Rico, where lots of SETI research is done. Image: Flickr/Hmboo Electrician and Adventurer

If we find an intelligent alien civilization, how will we talk to its inhabitants? There is, perhaps, no question that has been more frequently considered within science fiction. Well, now it's a question that NASA is very seriously thinking about and it's explored, at length, in a new e-book published by the agency.

The thing is, talking to aliens (or, the theoretically nearer-term challenge of decoding an alien radio communication), might not be all that different from understanding ancient Egyptian hieroglyphics or deciphering long-lost artifacts from a foreign culture. Sure, for all we know, aliens might all communicate with telepathy, with undetectable pheromones, or, in what would be a nice, easy twist, maybe they just straight up speak English like Kang and Kodos.

But it's also possible that they communicate in a way that might be reasonably decipherable, according to Douglas Vakoch, director of interstellar message composition at the SETI institute and editor of the book, called Archaeology, Anthropology, and Interstellar Communications.

"For a couple thousand years, we had no idea what the hieroglyphs said. We had this idea of them as this abstract, exotic language, this super language that had some higher meaning," he said. 

"Ultimately, that's not what they are. They are like other languages, and we just had to free ourselves of an assumption that held everyone captive. We had to see them in a new light and assume they were just like every language."

The idea explored in the book, then, is that, yes, alien messages might be impossible to decipher, but, assuming it's a radio signal or some other sort of electronic pulse, they must have a similar understanding of science and math as us. It's pointless to assume that, simply because a civilization is alien, they will be impossible to communicate with. And we can likely crack the code. 

The Rosetta Stone obviously helped us with the hieroglyphics problem, and Vakoch admits that "we aren't going to get something that is written in English and Klingon" to make it easy to translate between the two. But, he says, we can take analogs from what we do know: "We can think, do we have an analog to the Rosetta Stone? You can look at things like math and science. If you can build a radio telescope, then you must know some basic math, and you can look at those as potential rosetta stones."
What's important to note about Vakoch is that he's a social scientist, not an astrophysicist, as are most of the other contributors to NASA's new book.

"Even my background is in psychology, where we're attuned to understanding people who think like us," he told me. 

"Well, anthropologists and archaeologists are used to making contact and connections with completely foreign things. They have this mindset of encountering the 'radically other,' so most of them [were] very receptive to contributing to this book."

The first problem, of course, is actually detecting alien life. There's obviously no guarantee extraterrestrial intelligent life exists, and there's certainly no guarantee we'll find it. Vakoch says that SETI is a field that "requires tremendous patience," and thought experiments like this book are ways of helping prepare us to be ready to interpret an extraterrestrial message should we ever find it.

The fact that NASA published this book, and the fact that, just this week, the House of Representatives Science Committee held a hearing about SETI, is evidence that the government is once again beginning to take the search for intelligent life a little more seriously.

"It's very easy to make fun of this, just like it also would have been funny to make fun of Magellan before he sailed around the world," Seth Shostak, a senior astronomer with SETI, told Congress. "We looked in particular directions at a few thousand star systems—the fact we haven't found anything means nothing. This is like asking Christopher Columbus two weeks out of Cadiz if he'd found any new continents yet. We have to look at a few million star systems to have a reasonable chance."

And, if we do find something, NASA wants to be ready.

Jason Koebler

Understanding Alien Messages May Be No Different Than Decoding the Rosetta Stone | Motherboard

Friday, May 23, 2014

Little ‘coqui’ frog of Puerto Rico shows effect of climate change

A study on the differences in size and mating calls of a tiny Puerto Rican frog over a 23-year period suggests the male frog is getting smaller and its mating call becoming shorter and higher pitched. The differences may be caused by climate change.
The frogs known in Puerto Rico by the name "coqui" are some of the 186 species of the genus Eleutherodactylus inhabiting forests of southern United States, Mexico, Guatemala, and the Caribbean islands. There are 17 endemic species of coqui in Puerto Rico. For its abundance, the best known is the “Common Coqui” (Eleutherodactylus coqui). The species is named for the call that males produce. The call has two notes that sound like "Co" and "Qui" (hear it in video above). These sounds serve two purposes; "Co" serves to repel other males and establish a territory, while "Qui" serves to attract females.

Only male coquis sing. They start singing when the sun goes down at dusk, all night long until dawn. The Common Coqui is an animal of great importance in the culture of Puerto Rico and has become an unofficial symbol of the island.

The males are smaller than females. They measure an average of 27 millimetres while the females’ average size is 35 mm. However, as elevation increases, so does the size of the specimens. At higher locations in the forest, males grow to be nearly 50 mm and females about 60 mm.

In 1983, UCLA biology professor Peter M. Narins conducted an experiment in which he measured the pitch of the mating calls of 170 male coqui frogs, as well as their size, at different elevations in Puerto Rico’s El Yunque National Forest. What he found was that, as he went up in elevation, the frogs got bigger and their mating calls were slower in occurrence and lower in pitch compared to those of the frogs at lower elevations.

Twenty-three years later (2006), Narins returned to Puerto Rico and repeated the observations. Guided by the topographical maps he used two decades earlier, he measured the size and recorded the calls of 116 male coqui frogs along the road from about 10 yards above sea level to more than 1,100 yards above sea level.

El Yunque National Forest. Thirteen species of coqui frog  including the most common  Eleutherodacty...

Stanthejeep
El Yunque National Forest. Thirteen species of coqui frog, including the most common, Eleutherodactylus coqui, are endemic to Puerto Rico and live in El Yunque National Forest.
The average size of the frogs was smaller and their mating calls had grown faster and higher in pitch at every altitude. These changes were consistent with what may be expected in a warming environment. The results of this study became another contribution to the argument in support of climate change.
“All of the observed differences are consistent with a shift to higher elevations for the population, a well-known strategy for adapting to a rise in ambient temperature. Physiological responses to long-term temperature rises include reduction in individual body size and concomitantly, population biomass. These can have potentially dire consequences, as coqui frogs form an integral component of the food web in the Puerto Rican rainforest.”say the researchers in their report.
The research, entitled “Climate change and frog calls: long-term correlations along a tropical altitudinal gradient” authored by Peter Narins, Professor, Dept. of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, UCLA, and Sebastiaan Meenderink, a UCLA physics researcher, was published online April 9 in the journal Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

Read more: http://www.digitaljournal.com/science/little-coqui-frog-of-puerto-rico-shows-effect-of-climate-change/article/384297#ixzz32XTv9vuK

By Igor I. Solar

Little ‘coqui’ frog of Puerto Rico shows effect of climate change

Friday, May 09, 2014

New cassette tape could hold 47 million songs

(CNN) -- Forget the cloud, and rework your mental image of those mysterious data centers. Sony has reinvented a tool for storing a mind-numbing amount of data:

A cassette tape.

But this isn't one of those rattling plastic tapes you used to compile your ultimate summer road-trip jams and, too often, were probably forced to rewind with a pencil.

Sony's record-breaking magnetic tape technology allows it to store 180 terabytes of data on a single cartridge. That's the same amount of storage as 1,184 iPod Classics, Apple's roomiest music player, which can hold about 40,000 songs. Using that number, Sony's new cassette could technically store about 47.3 million songs of its own.
That's enough jams for a really long road trip -- say, driving in Atlanta during a snowstorm.

If you're more of a movie buff, think of it this way. The cartridge, which stores 148GB of data per inch of tape, has room for 3,700 Blu-ray discs full of your favorites.

The number obliterates the standing record, set in 2010 when Fuji developed a tape that could hold 35 terabytes of data.

Sony, which worked with IBM on the tape, presented the new technology over the weekend at InterMag Europe, a magnetics conference in Dresden, Germany.

In very simple terms, the technology involves shrinking the microscopic magnetic particles on tape that store data. On average, the new particles are 7.7 nanometers wide. There are 10 million nanometers in one centimeter.
In a news release, Sony said it would like to pursue a commercial use for the new cassette tape technology, as well as continuing to improve it.

But if you're dreaming of someday popping that tape into some sort of digital-age boombox and pushing "play," you may be in for a bit of a disappointment.

Tape has the potential for massive data storage, but it's unwieldy to actually use. Recording to, and retrieving data from, tape takes a lot longer than digital storage devices and players we've become accustomed to in an era of Web streaming.

So, it's a lot more likely that tape will be used to back up huge databases than to save, and play, our music collections. That's too bad. We liked the idea of needing only one cassette for a cross-country drive.

By Doug Gross

New cassette tape could hold 47 million songs